THE SORRAIA MUSTANG – GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Spanish mustangs are feral horses of Spanish descent, tracing back to the horses of the Spanish conquistadors. The most primitive and original of them are of Sorraia type. Sorraia Horses are a remnant population of an indigenous, South Iberian wild horse, which survived almost pure in the inaccessible lowlands of the Portuguese river Sorraia until the early 1900s. The Iberian scientist and horse expert Dr. Ruy d’Andrade discovered these horses in 1920 and is responsible for their preservation.
German hippologist Hardy Oelke discovered years ago that the Sorraia also lives on in certain strain of Spanish mustangs in America, as well as South American criollos, and proved this through mitochondrial DNA sequencing. The mtDNA analyses, done by a German institute for molecularbiological research, show that the amazing similaritiy of some mustangs and the Sorraia horse isn’t incidental, but prove their genetic relatedness.
Evidence suggests that Columbus may have already shipped Sorraias to the New World. More information on this is available in Hardy Oelke’s book "Born Survivors on the Eve of Extinction“ resp. the German edition "Das Vermächtnis des Columbus“.
Sorraia-type mustangs have been found in several BLM Herd Management Areas (HMA) that consist predominantly of Spanish Mustangs, and also among horses bred within mustang registries like the SMR and SSMA. The BLM herds that have produced the most Spanish Mustangs and Sorraia Mustangs are the Kiger herd in Southeast Oregon and the Sulphur Springs herd in western Utah. Sorraia-type mustangs were also found in some other herds, like the Pryor Mountain herd on the Montana/Wyoming state line and several Nevada herds.
The Sorraia Mustang Studbook was established to keep records of Sorraia Mustangs and to promote their pure breeding and preservation. To register a horse, send in name, date of birth, heigth, HMA it was captured in as well as photographs that clearly show the horse’s conformation and color, including a close-up of its head profile. In the case of a horse already registered in one of the Spanish mustang registries, include its registered name and pedigree information.
 

Sorraia mare and Sorraia Mustang mare – which is which?
Photo © Oelke
         
 
  If you are interested in the Spanish mustang and the Sorraia-type mustang and its preservation, you may write to:

  oehorse@t-online.de
 
  You will also find information about Sorraia horses at:

  www.sorraia.org
  
DUN COLOR AND WHITE MARKINGS
 
I’m breeding Spanish mustangs – are the dun factor colors to be preferred, as that was the color of the Iberian wild horse? And should I discriminate against white markings?

There is a general tendency among mustang owners to not think through completely what they are after. Mustangs are feral horses – domestic horses that reverted to a wild state. They aren’t wild horses in the zoological sense. As soon as a mustang has been captured and tamed, or if he was even born in captivity, he really ceases to be a mustang, but is again a domestic horse.
The wild mustang herds are populations of feral horses. You must realize: the ones captured from these wild herds and kept in captivity thus became domestic horses again.
 
       
With mustangs, be it in managing the wild herds or breeding them in captivity, one can go any way. Whatever one decides is legitimate: excluding any colors but the dun/grulla color, or allowing all colors; discriminating against white markings, not to discriminate against white markings, or even encouraging white markings – whatever one declares desirable is legitimate, after all.

In regard to the mustang registries, they are membership-oriented organizations, and whatever the majority of their members desire should be their standard. It may not be the individual breeder’s goal, but is the official standard of that registry.

As for genetics, there is no known link between the dun factor and white markings, or white markings and type, or any color and type. White markings occur on all basic colors, including dun and grulla, and are inherited independantly. White markings can occur on horses of ideal type as well as on those of inferior type. Somebody who doesn't want white markings might have to fight an occasional internal battle over a horse that embodies his/her ideal type, but happens to have white markings. Or the opposite can be the case.
 
 
It is quite a different issue for those interested in preserving the Sorraia-type mustang, because in that case, we are talking about an indigenous, primitive Iberian horse. In this case things aren't any longer a matter of taste, or preference; instead, we have a standard to go by that was set by Mother Nature, not by Man. If we want to go that route, we have to stick with regular dun and grulla, we have got to discriminate against white, and we even don’t have room for conformation preferences.
The fact that even among Portuguese Sorraias one can find an occasional one with white markings doesn't disprove this. Nobody claims the Sorraias to be entirely pure anymore. White markings in a Sorraia most likely reflect some outside blood that cropped out. At least 95 % of the Sorraia population is without white. A Sorraia with a white marking is an exception, not a typical example, or a standard to go by.

White markings occasionally occur even in wild species, as well as albinism, and melanism. For instance, there have been spotted deer, white buffalo, white elephants, black leopards, etc. If you were to preserve such species, would you go and pick the odd-colored ones? Or would you rather try to preserve what you know is typical?

White markings usually occur as a by-product of domestication and inbreeding, the latter often being linked to domestication. The extreme inbreeding alone would explain an occasional white marking among the Sorraias. However, it is more likely that some domestic blood is responsible if a Sorraia has some white.
 

Kiger Mustang stallion of very good Sorraia type in the wild
Photo © Oelke
         
         
       
SORRAIAS IN AMERICA?
 
Some simply claim there are no Sorraias in America. I guess what they mean is that the phenotypical similarities to the Portuguese Sorraia of what you call Sorraia Mustangs are just incidental? Is there proof for common roots of the original Sorraias and American mustangs?

If it has been said that there is no relatedness between the Sorraia and American horses, particularly mustangs, then there is good evidence to the contrary.

The phenotypical similarities of some mustangs and the Sorraia are strong, not just superficial, and that they aren’t freak occurrences has been scientifically proven by way of mtDNA analyses. The occurence of the Sorraia mtDNA genotype in a number of mustangs sufficiently proves the relatedness of these mustangs to the Sorraia, or the presence of Sorraia blood in those mustangs. Another way to say it would be that somewhere down the line, these mustangs and the Sorraias had a common mother.

If the relatedness has been proven for a number of mustangs through the maternal line, it stands to reason that the actual number of Sorraia descendants among mustangs is much higher. If the representation is evident in female lines, then the influence through male lines should be even greater – only that we can’t prove it (yet).

Regarding the similarity of Sorraias and Sorraia-type mustangs, the following are some statements made by renowned Portuguese Lusitano and Sorraia breeders, and horse experts:
 
 





 


Brother Love, SMR Mustang, pictured here as a 2-year-old, shows
strong Sorraia characteristics
Photo © Oelke
José Luis d'Andrade, breeder of Sorraias and Lusitanos:
"I was impressed by the photographs you showed me. The mustangs definetely look as our Sorraias, which are, as you know, an endangered species. I gladly confirm that these mustangs should be preserved and support your endeavor wholeheartedly, also as president of the Sorraia association. As you know, it was my grandfather, Dr. Ruy d'Andrade, who discovered and rescued the Sorraia horses, and he, too, would be excited about these horses in America."

Alfredo S. Baptista Coelho, Lusitano breeder, Sorraia owner, and contributing author to the magazine "Equitação":
"The Sorraia type horse is the ancestral Iberian horse, the wild type of the Lusitano and Spanish Andalusian breeds. I was very much surprised to see the pictures of some mustangs that you showed me. They have survived and are breeding true in (the) U.S.A. These horses should be protected as they are a rarity..."

Madalena Abecassis, Lusitano and Sorraia breeder:
"The way you are trying to preserve the Sorraia horse meets my full approval. As a long-time breeder of both, Lusitanos and Sorraias, I know that the Sorraia is the primitive ancestor of our modern Lusitanos, and as such, embodies all that is essential Iberian in a horse... It's so great you found those Sorraia-type horses among the American mustangs, and I certainly hope the Americans will realize what a rare thing they have in these horses. I couldn't agree more that the American Sorraias, or Sorraia Mustangs, should be preserved..."


Dr. Maria José E. G. Correia, veterinarian at the Portuguese National Stud:
"The special protection you are trying to achieve for certain mustangs is, in my view, of great importance. As you know, I am employed at the Royal Stud Farm in Alter do Chão and am taking care of the Sorraias there. I found the mustangs you showed me pictures of so similar to the Sorraia horses that I could not tell them apart.“
 

Yearling Sorraia Mustang filly of Sulphur Springs origin
Photo © Oelke
         
         
       
SORRAIA MUSTANG – A SPANISH COLONIAL HORSE?
 
If the Sorraia and the Spanish colonial horse are related, how come so many Spanish colonial horses look so different?

The Sorraia is not just a Spanish colonial horse. It was part of it, helped create it, but is much older. It was before Columbus. It was before Spain existed as a kingdom. It was before there were domestic breeds in Iberia.
Of the horses that were brought over by the Spanish, most likely only a small percentage were Sorraias, or of predominantly Sorraia blood. The horses of the Spanish conquistadores and colonists were mostly of man-made breeds, and of mixed lineage. From that foundation, all kinds of types could develop in America, and could be selectively bred by Man.

Whether the horses referred to today as "Spanish colonial“ are really in type (and lineage) what the horses of the conquistadores and Spanish colonists were is very questionable. While for most of them a Spanish ancestry can reasonably be assumed, and can in many cases even be genetically proven, the average so-called "Spanish colonial horse“ today seems to have little resemblance of the proud Spanish war horse that was world-famous at the time of the conquest.
 


 


Spanish horse, about 1650 and not much resemblance
to most horses that are called Spanish colonial horses in
America today. Granted, this painting is not great in
accurate detail, but the general type comes through
clearly
         
         
       
HISTORY, OR WISHFUL THINKING?
 
What you usually hear is that genotyping, conformation, and history are equally important in determining whether a mustang is a Spanish mustang. How reliable is the history part of this?

The history on all existing mustangs is at best interesting, but largely wishful thinking, and won’t do to prove a Spanish origin of any given mustang, or mustang population. There isn’t a single mustang herd that has continuously been monitored over the last centuries, and at closer scrutiny one invariably finds plenty of evidence for possible other influences. None of the herds’ history that were claimed as having been isolated for the last 100 years or so proved water-tight. But even if that were true – the "contamination“ of Spanish mustangs by horses of other origins started much earlier than a hundred years ago…

As for the horses bred within the various mustang registries, and the stock they all go back to: their foundation stock again was picked based on histories that don’t stand close scrutiny. In many cases it was good enough if the horses were possessed or bred by Indians – as if Indians had ever cared about a Spanish history of the horses they acquired. And the founders of these registries selected their horses based on whatever standards they believed in – nothing scientific, nothing proven, some of it definetely wrong. They had the best intentions, however, and along with many questionable ones they managed to save some sure enough special horses which we are all grateful for.
 

Mustangs at Caballos de Destino, Sharron Scheikofsky and Dave Reynolds, South Dakota
Photo © Oelke
         
         
       
WHAT ABOUT mtDNA?
 
What’s the big deal about mitochondrial DNA? Is it similar to the blood marker typing I’ve heard of? And is it true that it tells only half the story because it’s passed on only through the female line?

No, it is totally different from bloodmarker analysis, and much more advanced. The bloodmarker analysis is simply the wrong tool when it comes to the determination of relatednesses of populations and breeds. It is actually an outdated method every way one looks at it.

There is nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The mitochondrial DNA is found outside of the nuclear DNA. In contrast to nuclear DNA – and this is very important –, mitochondrial DNA cannot be altered through selective breeding.

Mitochondrial DNA sequencing can do two things:

1. It is the only reliable method to determine relatednesses between breeds and/or populations, and relatednesses of individuals to populations. In the latter case, bloodtyping for instance would fail completely.

2. It is the instrument to determine phylogenetic facts, i.e. ancestral relationships. For instance: Japanese geneticists had established through mtDNA sequencing that the Mongolian wild horse (a.k.a. Przewalski’s horse) is not an ancestor of our domestic breeds. This was later confirmed by the work of Jansen et al.*).
 
Again through mtDNA sequencing it was determined that the Neanderthaler was not an ancestor of the human race.

 
 

Yearling Sorraia Mustang filly of Sulphur Springs origin
Photo © Miyamoto
While it is correct that mtDNA is passed on only through the maternal line, the presence of a certain mtDNA pattern in an animal proves beyond doubt that, at least through the maternal line, this animal is indeed related to the population which this pattern is typical for. Through mtDNA sequencing done by the Institute for Molecularbiological Diagnosis (now Biopsytec Analitic) in Germany, a relatedness of Sorraias and certain mustangs was scientifically proven; the same holds true for a relatedness of certain mustangs and Andalusians and Lusitanos. This means that there are indeed mustangs which trace back at least in their maternal line to the Sorraia population, that others go back to the ancestor of the Andalusian, and there are also some which stem from the ancestor of the Lusitano. It stands to reason that if this is the case, many will in fact also go back in their paternal lines to the Sorraia and other respective ancestors, even though we can’t prove it (yet).

*) Jansen, Forster, Levine, Oelke, Hurles, Weber, Olek, "Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse", 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
   
         
         
       
SORRAIA TYPES AND NON-SORRAIA TYPES IN ONE FAMILY?
 
It’s been claimed that within one and the same mustang family, one may find horses of Sorraia type and others of a different type. Doesn’t that suggest that the Sorraia types are rather freak occurences?

Not at all. Whether this phenomenon actually exists is a question we won’t address here. If so, it can easily be explained. It’s a simple question of inheritance.

If you observe, for instance, how full siblings of a human family can be different in appearance, abilities, traits, etc., you won't find it unusual for full siblings of horses to differ. The human example is used here as it's usually easier to observe, because not too often do you get to know fully mature siblings of horses. Those who indeed get the chance to study many full siblings of horses will notice how different they often are.

That’s not the whole answer, though. The more mixed a given breed is, the more likely are foals to be different, even if they are full siblings. With wild species, the parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, etc., were all of the same type, so they breed true. If the parents are a mixture, maybe even a mixture of extremes, their foals naturally will be a wide variety of types and colors.

The Spanish mustang breeders and registries have been mixing different types, sometimes even extremes, right from the beginning. And by now they've done this for many generations… It's really no wonder if sometimes foals of the same mating are not uniform.
 
 










Miss Chato
Photo © Caballos de Destino
"Like begets like" is an old saying among horse breeders. That's how you establish type, that's how you establish uniformity. Mustang registries allow for crossing of dish-faced, Arab-type mustangs and convex-headed, Sorraia-types, and then in the next generation maybe cross on a compact pony type, or a draft type (yes, even those are part of the whole thing). The offspring of all these crosses are bound to breed inconsistently.

There have been some zoological experiments that shed some light on this: For instance, in a wolf x poodle cross, the first litter consisted of mostly dogs that were, in phenotype, an even mixture of both, wolf and poodle. However, when these siblings were again crossed on each other, they produced only a few that looked like that mixture – the genes started to split up again, and the results were mostly dogs either much like wolves or much like a poodle in type and color...

This is what happened and still happens with mustangs, too. Types split up and crop out.
Now we’re cutting to the chase: Those wolf-dogs of the latter generation(s) that looked pretty much like wolves didn't so by chance – it's the wolf genes that cropped out! If one had mated only those and continued to select the wolf types, one would have arrived at animals within a few generations resembling pure wolves, and they would indeed have very little poodle in them at all...
 
 

Silvertip F52, a relative of Miss Chato (above), is
out of Mountain Mist F15, which is out of Mexi
con Estrella, and a full brother and half brother
to a number of other SMS-registered horses

Photo © Oelke
   
Going back to mustangs, one can see what happens if a line is kept largely intact, where breeders have had a distinct idea of their type. Sharron Scheikofsky’s and Dave Reynolds’ horses are a point in case. They are comparatively reliable in how they breed. Here you find several generations in a line that are pretty much alike. Little Mex, Mexi con Estrella, Mountain Mist, and Misty Jo and her full siblings Silvertip and Silver Shadow are four generations, and are all looking like out of the same mold. It would make quite a striking picture if one could bring them all together in one photograph. – It all goes to show that the genes are still within the Spanish Mustang population, more in some horses, less in others – but they do crop out.

Is a horse with Sorraia characteristics worthless to the preservation of the Sorraia Mustang, should it be ignored, just because it has a sister or brother that differs somewhat in conformation and/or color? On the contrary! The sensible and responsible thing to do is to mate such horses with others of the same type, or even better type, and thus re-establish what is about to get lost!

That’s what the Sorraia Mustang Studbook is all about.
   
         
         
         
VALID QUESTIONS IN RESPONSE
 
It seems as if you are saying first that very few horses of Sorraia blood (part or pure) came over to the Americas. In the next section, you mention the impurity and "contamination" of the mustang population. Finally, you make the statement that "with most mustangs being descendants of Iberian horses, and not having been tampered with by Man, we can reasonably assume a more unadulterated ancestry in those mustangs of good Sorraia type." Doesn't one contradict the other here?
 
       
The statement that most likely only a small percentage of the horses the Spanish conquerors brought over were Sorraias, or of predominantly Sorraia blood, was made to acknowledge that they brought over horses of a variety of types and lineages. Which explains the presence of genetic material in America from which different types could be – and were – developed by selective breeding.
In addition, it is a known fact that mustangs were exposed to all kinds of "contamination" during the last few centuries - the government turned out Remount stallions to upgrade the mustangs, the ranchers turned loose whatever they saw fit to upgrade the mustangs with, other horses were turned loose because ranchers and farmers went bankrupt, etc.
Regarding Sorraia-type mustangs, it is also a fact that we don't know of anyone in America's history who ever bred mustangs, or horses, of Sorraia type. Therefore, if we can still find Sorraia types today in the wild anywhere in the West it is not because of Man's efforts, but due to Mother Nature's influences. That is meant by a more "unadulterated ancestry", it means "one not tampered with by Man". The characteristics we find in these horses aren't present because someone bred for them - they were retained from the original type.
In my book "Born Survivors on the Eve of Extinction" I tried to explain how animals choose, if given a choice, mates of their own kind, and how climate and terrain in the West are largely similar to what these horses were adapted to in Iberia; in other words, how Nature encouraged and favored these horses as long as their survival wasn't made nearly impossible by Man.
 

This grullo Sorraia stallion shows conformation and movement
typical for these horses

Photo © Oelke
         
         
       
SORRAIA MUSTANGS - WHAT CAN THEY DO?
 
It's all good and well to preserve the Sorraia Mustang as a genetic resource, but I would like to know: Can one ride them, or do anything else with them?

Sorraias have been used as mounts for the Portuguese vaqueiros (cowboys), and some have even been trained to perform at the highest level of dressage. Madalena Abecassis, a Portuguese horsewoman, has competed in driving contests with a team of four Sorraia stallions. On the old d'Andrade estate (Font'Alva), the vaqueiros still ride Sorraia geldings for general ranch work. The Sorraia is held to be the best mount for this type of work, and general cross-country riding. The same holds true for Sorraia Mustangs – they have been used for all kinds of riding purposes, cross-country pleasure riding, ranch work, endurance riding, you name it…

Just keep in mind that any horse, no matter what it is, must be properly conditioned and trained. Also, each horse is a product of his environment – a horse raised on flat land won't be as surefooted as one raised in hilly, rough country; a horse raised in a barn can never be as tough and able to withstand severe weather as one that grew up wild, fending for himself.
 


Dave Reynolds, South Dakota, on his stallion T53
Chato's Shadow. Dave and partner Sharron
Scheikofsky value their Sorraia Mustangs for their
soundness, endurance, surefootedness and
working ability

Photo © Caballos de Destino
 

Jerry Hilligoss and F53 Beetlejuice. This Sorraia Mustang stallion has made quite a name for himself as an endurance horse
Photo © Hilligoss
         
         
       
"SORRAIA MUSTANG", OR SIMPLY "SORRAIA"?
 
I can see the close resemblance of some of our American Mustangs, some Kigers especially, to some photographs I have seen of Portuguese Sorraias. And so I can see where the Sorraia Mustang comes from. I can also imagine how the Sorraia Mustang could play a role in the preservation of the Sorraia. However, then I hear that Sorraia Mustangs are a whole 'nuther thing from Portuguese Sorraias – not to get them confused. Which, to me, makes the Sorraia Mustangs seem insignificant. I feel like I'm missing part of the big picture.

I love the Kigers. If I can be convinced that the Sorraia thing is really about preservation and not just some slick way for a few people to make a bunch of money, then I am happy to do what I can to help.

 
       
Someone saying that the Sorraia Mustang is "a whole 'nuther thing" and not to be confused with Portuguese Sorraias could be meaning that in a correct way, but it can also be meant to question the whole Sorraia Mustang project. If one doesn't view Sorraia Mustangs of good type as impure Sorraias, or less pure Sorraias than the Portuguese ones (which can't be considered absolutely pure either), then one could indeed consider the whole effort meaningless.

Because these Sorraia-type mustangs seem to have inherited "a lot of Sorraia", they certainly seem to be worthwhile preserving. Their Sorraia genes must be considered worthwhile preserving… Bringing them together with those of other Sorraia Mustangs, or even Portuguese Sorraias, in order to "strengthen the genes", will, in the long run, result in horses indistinguishable in phenotype from the Portuguese Sorraias.

On the other hand, whoever said the two must not be confused, may simply be concerned about clarity and truthfulness. The development over the last few years went like this: At first, people had hardly ever heard of Sorraias; if they had, they didn't have a very clear idea of them, and they had been fed incorrect information. Then some got interested, and when they heard about Sorraia-type mustangs, they got interested in those. Next, some started to question the Sorraia, and question the Sorraia Mustang, but with many, the Sorraia-type mustang became popular. Pretty soon, people started to brag about their "Sorraia type" mustangs", some of which had only a foggy idea of what a Sorraia looks like. All of a sudden, some people even started to simply refer to their mustangs as "Sorraias" (which may not even have been Sorraia types, let alone registered SMS). They just nonchalantly called their mustangs "Sorraias". That's where things go out of hand, and why it is important to differentiate between Portuguese Sorraias and Sorraia Mustangs.
 
 

Afogado, a grullo Sorraia, is a herd sire in
Portugal and sire of both, Sovina and Tejo II, the
two Sorraia stallions that went to the USA

Photo © Oelke
   
Right now we have a situation where we find many mustangs with Sorraia characteristics, but only few that totally look like a Sorraia. While it's obvious that we are dealing with horses that have the potential and that deserve recognition and preservation, we must not ignore that they are "contaminated". Only through a determined breeding effort can we hope to arrive at a population of Sorraia Mustangs that breed true, and as a whole resemble the Portuguese Sorraia in phenotype.
I would advocate to always have different terms for the two, just to be above-board and honest about things. The term "Sorraia Mustang" was chosen because these horses have a mustang background. The goal is to preserve the Sorraia genes, not to deny their mustang background, or deliberately cover their origin and try "selling" them as being the same as Portuguese Sorraias.

Another aspect is: Portuguese Sorraia people appreciate the Sorraia Mustangs for what they are, and recognize their Sorraia ancestry. They would certainly frown upon anyone declaring their mustangs simply "Sorraias", and would likely oppose the Sorraia Mustang project if they felt something "fishy" was going on.
   

       
         
"AMERICAN SORRAIAS"?

Somewhere I read about "American Sorraias" - is there such a thing? And if so, how? It seems like some "true foundation Spanish mustangs" are named "American Sorraias" and are identified by DNA evidence, and go back to an origin from Columbus' horses? Do these "American Sorraias" really play a role in the conservation of the Sorraia gene pool?

If the term "Sorraia mustang" is applied to mustangs of Sorraia type, then one can see the reasoning behind it, but that does not make it acceptable. Mustangs of Sorraia type are still that: mustangs. To call any mustang an "American Sorraia" is a slap in the face to the Portuguese, and to anyone engaged in preserving the true Sorraia horse.

There are no "American Sorraias". There are mustangs of Sorraia type, and that is why the SMS was established. Because Columbus brought horses to the New World that were, most likely, what is today known as "Sorraias", the similarity between some mustangs and the Sorraia horse is thought to stem from that source. Since then, all mustang populations have been exposed to all kinds of other blood, and there is no pure Sorraia among any of today's mustangs.

There is no way that Sorraia ancestry can be proven by way of a DNA test. The Sorraia mtDNA type found in some mustangs only proves the existence of some Sorraia blood in the mustang population as a whole, which probably was absorbed hundreds of years ago; it does not prove any direct relationship, and certainly is no basis for classification of a horse as a "Sorraia type". I had the tests done in the late 1990s to prove or disprove Sorraia blood in the mustang population, and that is the only thing the test can do. It offers no information about an individual horse's immediate ancestry, or relationship. For instance: As mtDNA is only inherited through the maternal line (bottom female line), a horse's ancestors in all other lines could have had other mtDNA. Such a horse would be no closer to the Sorraia than any other horse.

The real problem however is when people classify horses as Sorraia types which in reality do not conform to that type. Within the context of the "Sorraia Folheto Informativo" (www.sorraia.org) and the "Sorraia Mustang Info Page" (www.spanish-mustang.org) there are many examples describing in great detail the phenotype of the Sorraia horse as well as photos of purebred Sorraias, and Sorraia-type mustangs. When dedicating oneself to the preservation of Sorraia-type mustangs, it is important to maintain a standard of perfection, which can only be the morphology of the purebred Sorraia. Any breeder who is creating a different set of defining criteria is pursuing a different agenda than the consolidation of the important atavistic qualities of the Sorraia, which have survived in certain North American mustangs, and actually diminishes and damages the preservation efforts already underway. Breeders are free to consolidate whatever characteristics they desire, but it is misleading and pervasively false to label such horses "American Sorraias".

It is a misconception to think there were any "documented American Sorraia horses" - that is a concept that is simply unrealistic. It is also unrealistic to think Sorraia types, or let's say mustangs with a Sorraia inheritance, could only be found among registered horses, like SMR or SSMA horses. It is a fact that the best Sorraia types have been found in the Kiger herd of southeastern Oregon and the Sulphur Springs herd of southwestern Utah, which doesn't mean there can't be others occasionally that are just as good in other BLM herds.

Regarding the preservation of the Sorraia horse, there is absolutely zero chance for those horses being bred as so-called "American Sorraias" to ever be considered a "genetic safeguard" by conservationists of the true Sorraia.

There is no verified "true foundation Spanish stock" in the American mustangs. Horses of Iberian type, or Spanish type, or Sorraia type crop out in several BLM herds, as well as in horses bred within the Spanish Mustang Registry, and other such registries. In no instance can be verified whether such a horse got its characteristics by tracing back to stock of the Conquistadors, or to later Iberian imports.

     
         

SPANISH ANCESTRY OF OREGON'S MUSTANGS, PARTICULARLY THE KIGER MUSTANGS

By Hardy Oelke

Everybody has heard of the term "Spanish mustang", but many may have wondered if there is any credibility to the theory of a Spanish ancestry of these horses. Well, we know now that it has been proven through mtDNA anylyses that most American mustangs indeed trace back to Iberian stock. This shows that many mustangs are not the "no-good-for-nothing mongrels" some prefer to call them.

However, mustang enthusiasts seem to be less concerned with scientific genetic tests, but are intrigued by - sometimes obsessed with - anything historical about these horses, even though it should be clear right frome the start that no definite history is available. Nobody kept track of who all came through any given area within the last 150 or 200 years, and with what horses. There are some hints, and even some facts, but everything remains very sketchy, and usually unreliable. And if actually more particulars were handed down through the generations in a given region, that wouldn't necessarily make the horses of that region more Spanish.

Arguably the most popular mustangs today are those found in the Kiger Herd Management Area in Southeastern Oregon. While mustangs of other BLM herds are adopted out for a nominal fee, Kiger mustangs were the first to be auctioned off to the highest bidder and to fetch considerable prices. This caused a lot of envy among admirers of other herds, and also breeders within existing mustangs registries. Consequently, Kiger mustangs got some "bad press", all kinds of rumors were started, and the Kigers were discredited.

So-called experts on Spanish horses and Spanish mustangs ranked the Kiger way down low as far as its "Spanishness" is concerned. This verdict is easily dismissed if coming from people who classified the Pryor Mountain mustang flatly as of the most Spanish type of all existing mustang herds - for, while there are certainly a few good Spanish types among them, there is a larger percentage of horses in that population that are of indifferent, and a considerable number that are of non-Spanish type.

If it has been said that Kigers varied considerably, and I go along with that. However, having said that, every single other herd out there varies even more, and so do the populations within registries. The Kigers are clearly the most uniform wild herd in existence today.

While there may be different opinions as to what constitutes Spanish conformation - even though there shouldn't be -, in my opinion Spanish conformation is certainly present in the Kiger herd sufficiently to characterize the Kiger as a Spanish mustang. Conformationwise, the Kiger does not have to take a back seat compared with any other mustang.

In another article I have pointed out that the genotype of most Kigers is an Iberian one, the same one that is found in other mustangs of Iberian extraction, like the Sulphur Springs, the SMR resp. SSMA horses, or the Pryors. Most Kigers have that same genotype. So again, the Kiger holds his own on that score, too.

Quite another issue is a Spanish history, or heritage. In assessing the history of other wild herds, people have made all kinds of claims, and most are but speculations. Well-meant efforts to document a Spanish history for the Sulphurs have focused on the Santa Fe trail, and on Indian raids into California. For the Pryor Mountain mustangs, the proximity to an old Indian travel route is stressed to "document" a Spanish ancestry. All that could, but will not be, disputed here, but what's not right is to deny the same for the Kigers.

That a Spanish heritage has been cracked up for the Pryor mustangs because an Indian travel route is supposed to have run in the relative vicinity of the Pryor range may seem weird though - as if Indians ever cared to look for Spanish type in the horses they stole, captured, or traded in! Indians took what nice horses they could get, and in many cases, simply what horses they could get.

While it stands to reason that, up to a certain point in time, what horses Indians had access to had to be descendants of Spanish horses, this wasn't necessarily the case anymore in later times, and certainly not anymore in the period before the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range was established. At compilation of historical facts regarding the Pryor horses published at one time by the BLM in Billings, Montana, makes it very obvious that whatever role Indian horses may have played in the foundation of the feral horses of that area, it was just a minor one at best.

We should be agreed on one thing: that for centuries, the wild horses were all derived from Spanish horses. There simply were hardly any other horses on American soil, definitely not in the West. The time when any relevant historical facts were recorded began about 100 or 150 years ago, and by then expeditions, trappers, settlers, and soldiers had made their way west, and horses from the East which were mostly of non-Spanish derivation had been introduced to the wild herds. So from then on, it was no longer a given that wild horses were necessarily of Spanish lineage. And nobody ought to entertain the idea that any Indian would have missed out on an opportunity to get his hands on a nice horse because he didn't consider it "Spanish"!

If we consider that the multitude of wild horses, all of Spanish descent, had originally spread from Mexico and Florida over all of what is the USA today, and well up into Canada, then we realize that there isn't a single region that couldn't have had its own original wild Spanish horse population - there is no need for special Indian raids, for a Santa Fe trail, for other trails, for Texas cowboys to have brought Spanish cow ponies up into Wyoming and Montana, for Indian travel routes to account for herds in the Big Horn Mountains, etc. There was plenty of opportunity for each neck of the woods to have retained its own original band of wild horses of Spanish ancestry, not because the animals were brought there due to certain circumstances, but because the horses wandered there by themselves in their expansion over North America.

One could even argue that all those regions that remained home to wild horses without any particular history would be more likely to have "uncontaminated" Spanish horses, and that where ever Man - white or red - has played any kind of a role, there were increased chances for an influx of other horse breeds!

In regard to the presence of Spanish wild horses in a given area the issue is not so much who brought them there, but rather how secluded could they have been there, how isolated were they from contaminating influences.

In Walker D. Wyman's "The Wild Horse of the West" one finds a map, showing horses to have reached Indians in Oregon/Washington, and Alberta, by 1710, 1730, and 1750 resp., and Oregon/Idaho between 1690 and 1700. At that time, they had to be of Spanish extraction, at least predominantly so. C. H. Smith ("The Naturalist's Library / Feral Horses of America") also gives a map, showing the Navajos to have had horses by 1650, the Shoshone by 1690, the Nec Perce by 1710, the Cayuse by 1720, the Yakima, the Blood, and the Crow by 1730.

One of the more extensive accounts of the history of the Spanish mustang is J. Frank Dobie's "The Mustangs". Here are just a few quotes from Dobie, testifying to the early spread of the Spanish horse:

"Towards the middle of the 18th century, wild horses were appearing in the Saskatchewan country of Canada, and they were Spanish horses. About the same time, east and north of the Canadian plains, that remarkable aggregation of untribed Indians and half-breed Frenchmen called Bois Brules, or Burnt Woods, became suppliers of Spanish horses and pemmican to the trapper-traders on Hudson's Bay and along the Red River of the North."
"From the winter-locked waters of the upper Saskatchewan to the lone grove of palms at the mouth of the Rio Graride on the Gulf of Mexico, the tribes came to their zenith in ownership and use of horses just as westward-moving white men were about to unhorse them forever. Nobody will ever know how many horses they had. In the Peace River country in 1811, Alexander Henry made these observations: 'Some of the Blackfeet own 40 or 50 horses (apiece). But the Piegans have by far the greatest numbers; I have heard of one man who has 300. Those animals are got from their enemies southward - the Snakes, Flatheads, and other nations, who have vast herds."
"The Cayuse Indians in Idaho owned so many horses that their name became the name not only for Indian horses in general but for cow horses over the Northwest."

It is needless to point out the immediate proximity of Idaho to Oregon, and that the Cayuse were roaming in Oregon as well…

Referring to the Lewis and Clark expedition in regard to Indians possessing horses, Dobie wrote:

"On the untimbered reaches of the Columbia River basin, Lewis and Clark found the Indians, especially Flatheads and Nez Perces, possessed of 'emence numbers' of horses as well as 'large and fine' mules. Spanish brands on most of the mules and on some of the horses showed their origin. Some individual warriors owned from 20 to 100 horses each."
"The explorers heard of wild horses running on the Columbian plains."

Norma Bearcroft wrote in "Wild Horses of Canada":

"Pure Spanish horses appeared in Saskatchewan very early in the 18th ceritury (before 1720) . When in 1754 an English fur trader named Anthony Henday went west from Hudson Bay and probably became the first European to see the Rockies, he was surprised to see whole tribes of Indians in Saskatchewan mounted on Spanish horses from which they hunted buffalo."

"The Blackfoot Indians of Alberta and Saskatchewan had Spanish horses 150 years after Cortez (1700) … the Snake Indians, whose hunting grounds extended from the Missouri River to South Saskatchewan, were horsed in 1730."

"Canadian Indians travelled freely back and forth across the border, trading buffalo meat and stealing horses at Spanish settlements. Ogden (of the Hudson's Bay Company) wrote in his journal dated December 20, 1827, of the dispersal of horses left to run wild in a country hundreds of miles away from any Spanish source."

For all these reasons, Oregon doesn't need a particular history of Spaniards roaming that territory in order for the Kigers (and other Oregon mustangs) to be recognized as Spanish mustangs - the wild horses of Spanish ancestry were perfectly capable of wandering there by themselves, and evidently have done so.

However, if we are looking for instances where Spanish horses were directly taken to Oregon, we can indeed find those, too. Irrespective of how wild horses of Spanish ancestry have conquered the continent on their own, and how this was expedited by raids and trades of various Indian tribes, there is one general fact to consider: The California ranching culture, the California vaquero's way of riding and training a horse, and of working cattle, was omnipresent along the whole Pacific slope and the dominant influence there. This culture reached up into Oregon and Washington, and to adegree even into British Columbia and Alberta, as well as into Nevada, Arizona and Utah. It was defined not only by the way cattle were handled, but the lore, the customs, and the equipment were all the same in "vaquero country", or "buckaroo country", which had an influence as far as Montana, something that becomes obvious when studying Charles Russel paintings.

The horses the California vaquero rode in his heyday were of straight Spanish descent, their ancestors stemming from Mexican (mostly Sonoran) horses, but occasionally refreshed by Spanish (and Portuguese?) imports. And the California vaquero took them wherever he went - into Nevada, Utah, and definitely into Oregon. To this day, western horsemanship in Oregon is identical to that in California, and it's similar in Nevada.

The late Arnold Rojas has left us an invaluable heritage in his two books "These Were the Vaqueros" and "Vaqueros and Buckeroos", which are brimful with anecdotes, and information like descriptions of ranches, horses, and customs, and provide a wonderful look into the days when "California was still young", as he liked to put it. Most of the stories told are set in the second half of the 19th century, and the early 20th century. The following quotations are evidence not only about California's mustangs, but also give some examples of how ranches in California and Oregon and Nevada exchanged horses. - Even if up to that time no wild horses had found their way into the Steens Mountains and the surrounding area (something that's actually inconceivable), what was going on in the second half of the 19th century was evidently enough to account for wild horses of Spanish ancestry in southeastern Oregon!

Rojas, who was familiar with the modern reined cow horse (of Quarter Horse lineage) said of the Spanish mustang in general: "No amount of breeding could produce a better stock horse than the Spanish mustang."

One of the California mustang herds that Rojas kept referring to was the Barileno mustang. So he said of one individual:

"As to the horse, he was a Barileno, a fine strain of mustang found on the Tejon (ranch) at that time. The name is derived from Barilitos (Barrel Springs) in Antelope Valley, where a herd of wild horses ran. Colors were usually buckskin, dark palomino and mouse color."

We need to consider that Rojas most likely didn't differenciate properly between buckskins and duns, so many of the horses he refers to here may have actually been duns.

In another story he dwells a bit more on the Barilerio mustang:

"This wild horse had its origin in the thirty-five mares and three stallions of purest Andalusian strain, brought into the desert and turned out to range at Barilito Springs by the ancestors of Don Jesus Lopez. The stallions fought for many days before the strongest conquered and killed his rivals. Thus the fittest survived to sire the wiry, compact mustang famous for endurance over the length and breadth of California … Nature provided them with a color to blend with the landscape; buckskin, grullos (crane colored) and golden palomino."

And some other place he wrote:

"Rancho Alamos y Agua Caliente was the property in part of Franscisco Lopez. Don Chico brought the first Spanish horses to Antelope Valley. They were called Barilenos - mustangs. Elisabet Lake was then known as Laguna de Chico Lopez."

Of wild horses in California Rojas said they "were so plentiful that one would be roped and mounted whenever the need for a fresh horse arose."
"Wild mustangs were numerous on the ranges and Jack observed many things about them. The broncos were pursued and overtaken by men mounted on horses taken from the same wild band. The mounted ones could outrun the wild ones because they were fed grain ."

More particularly regarding the spread of California mustangs into other states he wrote about cattle drives from California "into Utah when the Mormons … had stocked their ranges with California cattle and horses", and "….cattle move slowly, and cattle drives ran from one season into another through Nevada and into Utah."
"Perfecto Cuen … also told me he made drives into eastern Nevada and found the Indians there with documents given them by the early Spaniards. These migrations of cattle account for the slick Visalia saddle trees and rawhide reatas one finds in use on Nevada and Oregon ranches.
These drives must antedate the migrations over the Chisholm trail by some years and it must have been in the fifties (1850s) when the ranges in Nevada, Oregon and Utah were stocked with the California cattle and mustangs."

Then there are direct references to an exchange with Oregon ranches, ranches in the immediate vicinity of the Steens Mountains:

"Droughts, barb wire or bad luck would sometimes have so serious an effect on the colt crops that in a year or two the ranch would be short of saddle stock. One of the other ranches owned by the same company would send horses to supply the amount required for each man's string.
Foremen welcomed these opportunities to get rid of their meanest horses … This is how mustangs from the White Horse in Nevada, the Malheur or Harney in Oregon were to be found in the caballada (horse herd) on the Buttonwillow ranch in Kern county."

"Explorers in the Northwest found Spanish brands on horses as early as the 1830s. Cavalry mounts were obtained from a ranch in Kern County (California) in the 70's for use in Oregon, Arizona and in Mexico when American and Mexican cavalry joined in pursuit of the Apache Vitorio and his famous band."

"The Indians of the southern San Joaquin (valley) were by no means as docile. It was not long after the missions were founded that Tejonenos had learned the value of the animal (the horse) and had become expert in stealing them. They developed an uncanny ability for choosing only the superior horses among the bands. Many horses were driven across the Sierras to eventually come into the hands of tribesmen in the far North. Old-timers say, 'Se robaban los mejores" (They stole the best). Both, Juan Losada and George Leon of the Tejon Rancheria have told of Blackfeet raiding in the San Joaquin.
Explorers traveling along the borders of Canada met Indians riding horses which bore California brands."

Roping elk was one of the favorite pastimes of the vaquero:

"The Miller horses, which at that time were S Wrench Oregon mustangs, all weighing less than a thousand pounds, proved to be able to follow the elk better than any of the horses from the other ranches."

"The Spanish horse brought Blackfoot, Shoshone and Piute across the Sierra Nevada into the lush pastures along the coast to raid the missions and ranches. Mustangs were driven in many thousands over the Cajon, Tejon, Tehachapi, Walker's and other passes into New Mexico and across the Great Basin and over the Rockies into the prairie states."

"Ewing Young, the trapper, drove the first herd of cattle out of California into Oregon in 1836. This was the first of what might be called a 'trail herd' in the history of the West. Other cattle drovers soon began to follow his example, and after 1846 began moving great herds of cattle and horses to the East and North. Young had made a contract with the settlers of the Willamette Valley in Oregon to supply them with stock cattle. He finally hired a crew of vaqueros to drive his animals."

"He (Francisco 'Chico' Urrea) said that the Miller and Lux horses which were ridden by the vaqueros on the southern division were all S Wrench mustangs, and they came from the White Horse Ranch in Nevada and from the Maiheur and Barney ranches of Miller and Lux in Oregon. These mustangs are not to be confused with the southern range ponies which the gringos called 'broomtails'. The Oregon and Nevada horses were of the best Spanish stock, the best range horses in the West. Among them, Francisco says, were bayo, buckskin; rusbayo, light buckskin; bayo zebruno, zebra stripped buckskin; and grullo, crane colored, or slate gray (these never failed to have a black line down the back)."

(Here, Rojas is obviously mentioning duns, even though he did not use the term).

"After he had acquired his lands in California, Henry Miller set out to find more range land for his cattle. He came upon hidden valleys, high in the mountains, between the deserts of Oregon and Nevada. In one way or another, he managed to buy the land that controlled the water. Once in control of the springs, creeks and rivers, he would have the use of millions of acres that would be worthless to other stockinen who owned no water rights. Much of the land Miller used for his cattle was either leased or free range. He had developed a cross between a Red Durham and Hereford, which would thrive on the roughest terrain. These he used to stock his Oregon and Nevada ranges. Among his proudest vaqueros were those who pushed cattle from the valleys of California across the Sierras into Pisen Switch on the Walker River in Nevada and up into the White Horse, Harney and Malheur, in Oregon."

Such undertakings, with vaqueros riding California horses, could not have failed to bring such horses into Oregon!

Arnold Rojas was not the only one who testified to the flow of California Spanish horses into Oregon. In Edward Gray's book "Life and Death of Oregon 'Cattle King' Peter French" we find on one page a photograph captured "Peter French and some of his best buckaroos who drove several thousand head of 4- and 5-year-old steers in the late 80s to Umatilla, Oregon" (from California).

Gray mentions somewhere else:

"Doctor Glenn picked a very competent young man (Peter French) to lead his cowboys and trail 1,200 head of cattle from the Jacinto Ranch (California) to Harney County."

"Giles French states that French left Colusa County, California, in June, 1872 with six Mexican vaqueros, a Chinese cook, and twelve hundred head of cattle. The cattle drive followed in part those made by earlier trail herds and sheep drives from Northern California to the mines of Canyon City, Oregon, and Silver City, Idaho. A well-definded route had been established to both cities by 1872."

Gray basically confirms what Rojas wrote about Henry Miller:

"There were others who started cattle operations with support or were themselves independently wealthy: Henry Miller and Charles Lux of the famed Miller and Lux cattle empire, better known as the Pacific Live Stock Company in Oregon. With ranches in Grant, Harney, and Malheur Counties, Miller and Lux had many ranches in Harney County with the most well-known being the Island and White Horse ranches. In 1895, Henry Miller managed over one million acres in the states of California, Nevada and Oregon. Over the years, the land these once proud men controlled from their offices in California have been divided, sold, or reverted back to government control. Nothing more than a few geographic names remind us of their past."

Let's finally take a look at whether or not the Spaniards themselves were in Oregon. Lenette Stroebel, Prineville, Oregon, stated:

"Gordon Shortreed here in Prineville has a Spanish sword found on the rimrock when Bowman dam was built. There are Spanish mines in the Camp Creek area, as well as the remains of a rock fort near the mines.
Early ranchers in the Camp Creek area found huge 'pots' (which they used for watering livestock) which are similar to those used in Spain today for certain mining processes. Camp Creek is perhaps 100 miles from Beatys Butte (where the original horses were gathered that became the nucleus of the Kiger herd). There is definite evidence of the Spanish having been here. There were not really any 'settlements', because their only reason for being here was to obtain gold. There is some evidence that the Spanish had expeditions as far as Canada and that the Indians (Shoshone) ended the Spanish occupation here, maybe about 1600. The last conflict between the Indians and Spanish was supposed to have been near the north end of the Steens Mountains.

Scott McDonald, Ukiah, Oregon:

"Not that it really matters, but there is some scant physical evidence of early Spanish exploration into southeastern and southcentral Oregon. Wild horses are documented in southeastern Oregon circa 1830, about 40 years prior to Anglo settlement."

"There are a lot of evidence of the Spaniards in this area (Oregon) prior to the settlers coming here, the trappers, etc,." said Andi Harmon from Oregon. "Many Indian legends speak of the Spaniards."

If one studies reports of expeditions to the West, one sometimes comes across accounts that testify the scarceness of horses, wild or in the hands of Indians. This is to question the dates given by some authors as to when the various Indians had acquired the horse, as well as the numbers given in other reports, the logic being that there couldn't have been many horses in a given area if hardly any were sighted during a trip of several weeks across the wilderness. However, I personally think it's entirely possible for plenty of wild horses to have existed in the general region where such a trip was made, without being seen at all. One must consider the vast expanses the horses roamed in, and that they were probably as wild and shy as so many deer or jackrabbits. One can today drive all day across America, through states that are home to thousands of deer, or elk, seeing but a few, or maybe even none at all. Just because a group of people made a trip of several hundred miles through the wilderness and didn't get to see many horses doesn't actually mean all that much...

Rather interesting is the fact that Arnold Rojas in his books more than once mentioned Portuguese that came to California, even when the country was in its infancy (or maybe especially then). One such reference is the following remark:

"This was probably a heritage of the Portuguese bullfighter, for many of the Conquistadores were Portuguese."

Don Avila, father of modern horse trainer and showman Bob Avila, told this writer that his name is Portuguese and that his family traces back to Portuguese immigrants.

The town of Vale in eastern Oregon possibly bears a Portuguese name - in both, Spanish and Portuguese, "vale" means "voucher" or "coupon", but in Portuguese it also means valley. Those familiar with the geography around Vale know that it's situated in a valley.

A question that might be impossible to answer today is, what is accountable for the fact that a mtDNA genotype is found in Oregon's Kiger herd that we don't find in other mustang populations. It is remarkable that the Kigers so far are the only mustang population with individuals of the A3 mtDNA pattern, which is found in Lusitanos, the major Portuguese breed, but also to a degree in Andalusians. Maybe we shouldn't consider the North American mustang's original foundation strictly a "Spanish" one, but should refer to it as "Iberian", for that would also include Portugal.

Taking a look at the more recent past prior to The Act, and the BLM's involvement, is also of interest. Much has been written and even more has been said and rumored about the Kigers' history that is simply wrong. "If people don't know the real story, they will often make up what they consider must have happened", said Ron Harding, formerly responsible for the Kiger and Riddle HMAs with the BLM.

Vickie Speirs, from Texas, had this remark to make regarding mustangs of southeastern Oregon:

" Gilbert Jones (born in the early 1900s and founder of the Southwest Spanish Mustang Association) … told me about the fine dun horses from the Kiger Gorge that he himself had seen as a young man."

Oregonian Andi Harmon wrote that her grandfather Billy, who had been in Southeastern Oregon before and after World War II, told about "countless numbers of duns that roamed just south of his place in south Catlow Valley in the l950s and l960s ... about 60-70 miles east, as the crow flies, from Beatys Butte."

According to Ron Harding, Kiger Gorge reportedly got its name due to a gentleman whose last name was Kiger, and who in search of forage for his cattle came upon the gorge. He wintered his cattle there, and the story also says that this Mr. Kiger saw horses there of "golden dun" color. However, those seemed to have disappeared by the time the BLM created the Kiger HMA.

"One thing I do know is that the golden duns spoken of were not here when I arrived in 1974," said Harding. "When I first came to the knowledge about the dun factor horses now referred to as Kigers, an old horse runner by the name of Bob Bailey was the person that told me about them in 1974. He called them the 'Orianna mustangs' and said that if any of the duns were left that they would be found on Beatys Butte. I asked him why, and he said that there were no fences there and the terrain was so rocky you couldn't get to the area with a saddle horse. Needless to say, when we gathered Beatys Butte three years later, we found the dun horses. We put some of them on Riddle Mountain and some in the East Kiger Herd Management Area, after cleaning the horses out of the East Kiger HMA. Two mares from the East Kiger HMA were put back with the duns. Anything that has been done on the Riddle Mountain and Kiger HMA is a matter of record. Fortunately I kept good records through the years until 1996, when I retired. From what I can tell, the records are still in good shape."

In "Life and Death of Oregon 'Cattle King' Peter French", Edward Gray mentions several people by the name of Kiger. We read regarding the buying out of smaller ranches by Peter French:

"The first buy occurred on June 11 and July 13, 1878, when French paid Reuben C. and Menervia Kiger, and W. B. Kiger, $8,000 for 640 acres which extended his holdings to the upper end of Diamond Valley."

Thus, the story how Kiger Gorge got its name does seem credible...

So, for anyone willing to take an objective look at the history of California and Oregon, it is quite obvious that the existence of Spanish mustangs in Oregon cannot only be explained credibly, but under the circumstances was inevitable. Mustangs of Spanish resp. Iberian ancestry in Oregon may have derived from wild horse migration and Indian activities in the area, as well as directly through Spaniards, and cattle drives and ranching activities later. That the Kiger mustang indeed does have an Iberian ancestry is, after all, evidenced by mtDNA analyses.

   
         
         
         
UPDATE –
SMR/SSMA HORSES CONSTITUTE LARGEST NUMBER OF SMS-REGISTERED MUSTANGS
 
A check on horses registered with the Sorraia Mustang Studbook (SMS) showed that animals of SMR breeding and SSMA breeding make up the largest number of mustangs registered with SMS. Horses in the SMR (Spanish Mustang Registry) and SSMA (Southwest Spanish Mustang Association) have been bred for decades in captivity and are descendants of foundation horses selected by the founders of these registries, mainly the late Bob Brislawn and the late Gilbert Jones; most of them are registered with both, the SMR and the SSMA. In recent years, a number of additional mustangs have been accepted by the SMR and/or the SSMA, namely the Cruce-Wilbur horses (from a private ranch) and the Cerbat horses (both from Arizona), and some Sulphur Springs horses (the two latter being BLM mustangs). The first-mentioned two herds play practically no role in the SMS-registered population, while Sulphur Springs mustangs are well represented in the SMS.

At the time of screening, six horses were registered in the Permanent division of SMS, 111 in the Foundation division, and 129 in the Tentative division.

A considerable percentage of Kiger and Sulphur Springs mustangs were registered in the Foundation division. They are outnumbered by SMR-bred horses, which comprise roughly half of the horses in the studbook.

Also, a number of Kiger X Sulphur crosses, or crosses of Kiger X other mustangs, or Sulphur X other mustangs, have been registered.

A closer look at the individual horses reveals that most of the best types come from the Kiger herd, and some of the best types from the Sulphur Springs herd. It's usually some white markings that keep these horses from being registered in the next higher division.

The Kiger herd is the only wild herd so far with a number of horses established as having the "Lusitano mtDNA pattern" (A3). The only lines with the Sorraia mtDNA pattern (A1) were SMR horses (deriving originally from the Book Cliffs in Utah).

The one characteristic most horses lack is the convex profile, and so far, more convex profiles have been found among the Kigers than among the other groups. The Sulphur Springs mustangs have usually the best stripes, with some Pryors being striped almost as strongly.

Other characteristics that horses most usually get marked down for are lack of size, compactness of body (as opposed to the lean, leggy Sorraia type), lack of bi-coloration in mane and tail, and excessive hair on legs.

Among other BLM Herd Management Areas that have contributed to the SMS are the Beatys Butte HMA (Oregon), the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range (Montana/Wyoming), the Shawaveh HMA (Nevada), the Sheepshead HMA (Oregon), and the Warm Springs HMA (Oregon). One mare from a wilderness area in Canada has also been registered.

Note: There is now not only a Kiger mare in the Permanent book, but also a Pryor Mountain mare. The other horses in Permanent (besides one Sulphur Springs mare) are the results of direct Sorraia X Sorraia Mustang matings.
 

The leg stripes of Little Mex




Pryor Mountain mustang mare of good Sorraia
type

Photo © Oelke




Mexi con Estrella, daughter of Little Mex, registered SMS under F18, is a daughter of
Little Mex and dam and granddam to a number
of SMS-registered horses. She is SMR- and
SSMA-registered, and belongs to the largest
group of horses whithin the SMS

Photo © Caballo de Destino




Little Mex was a mustang mare
out of Mexicali Rose, which was
a wild mustang in Old Mexico.
She became a foundation dam
of Spanish mustangs, and
mustangs with strong Sorraia
characteristics
   
                                                                               

 

       
         
UPDATE –
PROGRESS IN BREEDING SORRAIA MUSTANGS
 
Things are happening in the world of the Sorraia Mustang. It is a breakthrough that Altamiro, the young Sorraia stallion that went from Germany to Canada, has sired foals with mustang mares, and they look very promising, too. And Diane Pinney, a dedicated breeder of Sorraia Mustangs in Oregon, mostly of Kiger extraction, can also be happy with the results her program is yielding. BubbaDusty, a stallion she bred that is by her senior sire, Silver Bullet, is the most Sorraia-like stallion I've come across so far. The only thing that keeps him from being included in the Permanent book of the SMS is the star he has on his forehead, but typewise, he got "Sorraia" and "Iberian" written all over him. Diane is proud of her 2008 foals, too.





BubbaDusty
Photo © Oelke
 



Silver Bullet
Photo © Oelke




Mares from Diane Pinney
Photo © Oelke

         
         
First Sorraia Mustangs born in Ontario!

Altamiro, the Sorraia stallion that was born in Springe, Germany, and went to Manitulin Island in Ontario, Canada, already has sired offspring! He was fertile already at the tender age of two, as evidenced by three foals that were born in the Spring of 2008, a colt, named Animado, a filly, named Fada, and another colt, Interessado. Now a three-year-old, Altamiro slipped into his new role as a father and harem sire with amazing ease, and proved to be a extraordinarily caring daddy. He took charge of the first baby colt the second it was born, almost "outshining" the new mother, licking it, nudging it to get up, protecting it.

The two mothers were maiden mares and are SMR-registered. There is another mare in the herd, called "Ciente" for short, a Kiger mustang, which delivered the last foal of the season, Interessado.

 
 
 
    
         
         
BORN SURVIVORS ON THE EVE OF EXTINCTION
Can Iberia's Wild Horse Survive Among America's Mustangs?
 
 
The must-have book on Sorraias, mustangs, and Sorraia Mustangs.

"One of the most important and especially responsible works published in recent years", says zoologist Prof. Dr. Willmann about this book, which brings to your attention one of the world's last primitive horses, the Sorraia, and the precarious situation its offshoot, the Sorraia-type mustang, is in.

Wild Horses, Feral Horses, and Ancestral Horses, History of the American Mustang, The Spanish Mustang, The Preservation of the Spanish Mustang and the Sorraia, Scientific Proof for the Authenticity of the Sorraia Mustang – these are topices covered in this outstanding book, which deals with Przewalski's horse as well as with the Tarpan, with ancestral wild horse forms, with the "Barb myth", with the question of how Sorraias came to the New World, with how they could survive in the wild, and with the history of different mustang herds.
 
 
THE INDIGENOUS IBERIAN HORSE…
  

The Sorraia horse is the most primitive Iberian horse known to Man that still exists, a probable ancestor of the proud Lusitano, of Spanish Mustangs and Central and South American breeds. Indigenous to South Iberia, and influencial in the creation of many domestic breeds, the Sorraia horse is today critically endangered. It is no longer found in the wild in its homeland, but a few herds remain in domestication and semi-domestication.

Much misinformation has been disseminated about this ancient subspecies, but here is the first book in English, offering first-hand knowledge and authentic historical data!

What's more: Incredible as it may seem, this horse survived true in type among some American mustang herds!

"Born Survivors on the Eve of Extinction" – interesting, educational, and fascinating reading for all Iberian horse enthusiasts, wild horse lovers, and mustang fans

 
Born Survivors on the Eve of Extinction
– Limited Edition –
by Hardy Oelke
95 pages, lots of beautiful color photographs, hardcover
$ 29.95 plus shipping and handling
Available at Premier Publishing Equine,
POB 137, Wamego, KS 66547-0137
phone 785-456-8600
E-mail: hoofnote@wamego.net
http://horsesonly.com/books/inprint/born_survivors.htm
 
 
         
         
top of this page